Comments - Latest Popular Stories, Instablogs Community by Pankaj

Nic

Nic — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

Makes perfect sense though can’t say I’d considere the possibility previously. As a particular culture’s niche becomes obsolete due to such changes, they’re more likely to adapt, which means much more competition for the same limited resources.

Numerouno

Numerouno — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

You know what this means...war.

Nic

Nic — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

Riiiiight... as if before ’climate change’ there were no wars or conflicts. Thanks for clearing that up.

Numerouno

Numerouno — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

I vote for a speedy climate change. May only the fittest survive.

If you don’t like my views...Meh!

Maynard

Maynard — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

Climate change is certainly of global concern. But taking good care of our environment is another.

There should be a striking balance between prospering technology and environmental protection.

These issues should not be clashing to each other. Afterall, our main point of discussion is having comfortable human life. How can you make a better world if one good thing you create results in detrimental effects to the other.

What governments, especially those with the rich resources, should do is to make sure that whatever they propose must be well-thought and planned. They should be looking at every perspective about the good and bad points of their actions.

Nations should relearn the very essence of the adage, ”No man is an island.” Every one is interconnected to each other. Every country has an impact to the world as a whole.

Let adaptation and cutting down of carbon dioxide emissions be considerations in planning whatever is best for everyone.

Maynard Delfin

Manila, Philippines

Balbhadra Rana

Balbhadra Rana — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

No. Time is running out fast. We have reduce carbon dioxide emissions NOW.

Vinod

Vinod — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

Adaptation to what? We all know with the climate change we are inching towards death and there, I think, can be no adaptation. Whether it�s the developing nations or the developed ones, we are not willing to take the suitable measures and that is why the anomaly. We realize it but are not serious yet even the developed countries are playing the blame game to escape the responsibility. So, rather looking for the adaptation, which I don�t think can be done, taking effective measures against it would be more effective and worthwhile.

Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

In the present world, we couldn’t compromise with the new inventions that are coming everyday... then to make adjustment with these problem will be batter... than to make the useless noise for nothing - something that no one can compromise up on or do without... what say? I may be bit wrong that but one could fully deny these things, can you?

Mitchell

Mitchell — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000

adaptation is what we need at the moment! can we do anything else? can we stop the technical advancement... we are the losers on both side... with technical advancement or without that - so adaption will be the best antidote because I don’t see any other way out as no one is interested in dealing with the issues so what to do? be adaptive and you will be at ease. that’s it!