
Yes # Sensationalising mass killers or fanatics is encouraging copy cats.
# The media practice of focusing on records, as calling one incident as ‘the worst school shooting ever’, or ‘the worst mall shooting ever’ is challenging others to become the next record-holder.
# Media should make victims the lead without glorifying the fanatic’s notorious background to remove the celebrity status from the whole episode.
No # Absolutely not, these extremists are usually more interested in the crime itself than the person who committed it.
# If the media do not sensationalise the whole episode, it’d be hard to stop the rampant speculation across the Web, speculation that could cause harm via rumor and innuendo?
# It is the act that inspires the extremists, not the celebrity status.
It’s media’s job to report on all aspects of the news that include the background of killers without eulogizing. And if the things are brought on fore, doesn’t matter how bad they are, why to blame it on media?
Many people think media as a source of conflicts and gossips and they have a wrong impression that they only sensationalize stories. If you think media are violating any law, go to the courts and file a case so that they will be punished for what they are doing.
In cases of extremism, it is better to be more aware of the situation of possible terror attacks than to treat this as a normal thing.
Since media are able to communicate to these fanatics only tells us that authorities are lax in capturing the terrorists. In cases like this, the issue of extremism seems to be game without full force of the police to hunt terrorists.
Instead of just pointing fingers to media as ”exaggerated” storytellers, take your part in extinguishing extremism and suggest ways to the government to solve the issue of extremism.
Maynard Delfin
Manila, Philippines
The George Orwell told us in his essay how the words, especially the adjectives, are exploited for the purpose of propaganda.
Saying that media has a duty to present the facts is right, but don’t it also has responsibility to hide many facts? Many times some facts are there only to be misused. When the name of terrorists are given in media the Muslims terrorists are more spotlighted creating the wrong notion that all terrorists are Muslims, which is factually wrong, making an atmosphere where every Musilm with a beard is seen with a suspicious eye.
Media has very important function in any state that is to ask the right questions. But that is a far more difficult thing than it sounds, and erring in it without realising is very easy. So it is requested that freedom of speech which is a basic right of every human on the face of earth be exercised judiciously as its repercussions are really grave for everyone.
However, today it has gone beyond traditional media’s hands either to play down or over play a terror incident. The terrorists have taken matters into their own hands. They have become internet savvy. Now, every beheading is being broadcasted thru their own websites, community video sharing sites like YouTube etc. It is now not dependent upon traditional media to spread whatever they are doing.
When the Wall Street journal Daniel Pearl was murdered, not even a single TV news channel showed what it was like. But the video nonetheless, was ’leaked’ and is freely available all over the net. Same goes with many such incidences. Terrorists blowing up buses, army conveys in Iraq, suicide bombings wherever they take place, how to make bombs, hate speeches, propaganda, or whatever. Everything is available on the net.
The catch-22 situation now for the media is that they have to show (moral standings notwithstanding) because in any case they would be available to whosoever seeks the info/videos.
If an Ayman al-Zawahiri or an Osama bin-Laden or any other wants to bring out a tape, they wouldn’t depend upon the mainstream media to let their voices out. They already have the tool - Internet.
So, as I said, it’s a wee-bit late now to pin it on media (read mainstream media). The thing has gone out of every authority’s hands.
Whatever they say should be heard by all. Firstly it will expose them to the public as to what they are. An informed citizen will be of immense help to the law enforcement agencies.
Secondly the notion of curbing the media from reporting whatever Laden or al Zawahiri says smacks of paternalism. ”The public is not clever enough and might be swayed by those madcaps.” This attitude is a sure-fire recipe to the rise of totalitarianism, which will only help the likes of the Fanatic fom Saudi Arabia.
Information is wealth!
Thanks and Regards,
Ramya Tadikonda.
Local Opinions (17)
what am i tryin to say is that the media’s job to report on all aspects of the story is important but the more important part what i see as missing these days from the main stream media is responsibility. We have to responsibly see who he was rather than knowing that he had a profile on Orkut or Facebook for that matter. this is so irrelevant to the incident and a serious mishandling of the coverage that we unfortunately see too often these days. That’s an obligation of ours.
One can already hear the roar coming out of the mouths of many who have not been thinking of this in a critical way, particularly those well-paid mouthpieces on TV and radio masquerading themselves REPORTERS
It’s media’s job to report on all aspects of the news that include the background of killers without eulogizing. And if the things are brought on fore, doesn’t matter how bad they are, why to blame it on media?
Many people think media as a source of conflicts and gossips and they have a wrong impression that they only sensationalize stories. If you think media are violating any law, go to the courts and file a case so that they will be punished for what they are doing.
In cases of extremism, it is better to be more aware of the situation of possible terror attacks than to treat this as a normal thing.
Since media are able to communicate to these fanatics only tells us that authorities are lax in capturing the terrorists. In cases like this, the issue of extremism seems to be game without full force of the police to hunt terrorists.
Instead of just pointing fingers to media as ”exaggerated” storytellers, take your part in extinguishing extremism and suggest ways to the government to solve the issue of extremism.
Maynard Delfin
Manila, Philippines
The George Orwell told us in his essay how the words, especially the adjectives, are exploited for the purpose of propaganda.
Saying that media has a duty to present the facts is right, but don’t it also has responsibility to hide many facts? Many times some facts are there only to be misused. When the name of terrorists are given in media the Muslims terrorists are more spotlighted creating the wrong notion that all terrorists are Muslims, which is factually wrong, making an atmosphere where every Musilm with a beard is seen with a suspicious eye.
Media has very important function in any state that is to ask the right questions. But that is a far more difficult thing than it sounds, and erring in it without realising is very easy. So it is requested that freedom of speech which is a basic right of every human on the face of earth be exercised judiciously as its repercussions are really grave for everyone.
However, today it has gone beyond traditional media’s hands either to play down or over play a terror incident. The terrorists have taken matters into their own hands. They have become internet savvy. Now, every beheading is being broadcasted thru their own websites, community video sharing sites like YouTube etc. It is now not dependent upon traditional media to spread whatever they are doing.
When the Wall Street journal Daniel Pearl was murdered, not even a single TV news channel showed what it was like. But the video nonetheless, was ’leaked’ and is freely available all over the net. Same goes with many such incidences. Terrorists blowing up buses, army conveys in Iraq, suicide bombings wherever they take place, how to make bombs, hate speeches, propaganda, or whatever. Everything is available on the net.
The catch-22 situation now for the media is that they have to show (moral standings notwithstanding) because in any case they would be available to whosoever seeks the info/videos.
If an Ayman al-Zawahiri or an Osama bin-Laden or any other wants to bring out a tape, they wouldn’t depend upon the mainstream media to let their voices out. They already have the tool - Internet.
So, as I said, it’s a wee-bit late now to pin it on media (read mainstream media). The thing has gone out of every authority’s hands.
Whatever they say should be heard by all. Firstly it will expose them to the public as to what they are. An informed citizen will be of immense help to the law enforcement agencies.
Secondly the notion of curbing the media from reporting whatever Laden or al Zawahiri says smacks of paternalism. ”The public is not clever enough and might be swayed by those madcaps.” This attitude is a sure-fire recipe to the rise of totalitarianism, which will only help the likes of the Fanatic fom Saudi Arabia.
Information is wealth!
Thanks and Regards,
Ramya Tadikonda.
Global Opinions (17)
what am i tryin to say is that the media’s job to report on all aspects of the story is important but the more important part what i see as missing these days from the main stream media is responsibility. We have to responsibly see who he was rather than knowing that he had a profile on Orkut or Facebook for that matter. this is so irrelevant to the incident and a serious mishandling of the coverage that we unfortunately see too often these days. That’s an obligation of ours.
One can already hear the roar coming out of the mouths of many who have not been thinking of this in a critical way, particularly those well-paid mouthpieces on TV and radio masquerading themselves REPORTERS
It’s media’s job to report on all aspects of the news that include the background of killers without eulogizing. And if the things are brought on fore, doesn’t matter how bad they are, why to blame it on media?
Many people think media as a source of conflicts and gossips and they have a wrong impression that they only sensationalize stories. If you think media are violating any law, go to the courts and file a case so that they will be punished for what they are doing.
In cases of extremism, it is better to be more aware of the situation of possible terror attacks than to treat this as a normal thing.
Since media are able to communicate to these fanatics only tells us that authorities are lax in capturing the terrorists. In cases like this, the issue of extremism seems to be game without full force of the police to hunt terrorists.
Instead of just pointing fingers to media as ”exaggerated” storytellers, take your part in extinguishing extremism and suggest ways to the government to solve the issue of extremism.
Maynard Delfin
Manila, Philippines
The George Orwell told us in his essay how the words, especially the adjectives, are exploited for the purpose of propaganda.
Saying that media has a duty to present the facts is right, but don’t it also has responsibility to hide many facts? Many times some facts are there only to be misused. When the name of terrorists are given in media the Muslims terrorists are more spotlighted creating the wrong notion that all terrorists are Muslims, which is factually wrong, making an atmosphere where every Musilm with a beard is seen with a suspicious eye.
Media has very important function in any state that is to ask the right questions. But that is a far more difficult thing than it sounds, and erring in it without realising is very easy. So it is requested that freedom of speech which is a basic right of every human on the face of earth be exercised judiciously as its repercussions are really grave for everyone.
However, today it has gone beyond traditional media’s hands either to play down or over play a terror incident. The terrorists have taken matters into their own hands. They have become internet savvy. Now, every beheading is being broadcasted thru their own websites, community video sharing sites like YouTube etc. It is now not dependent upon traditional media to spread whatever they are doing.
When the Wall Street journal Daniel Pearl was murdered, not even a single TV news channel showed what it was like. But the video nonetheless, was ’leaked’ and is freely available all over the net. Same goes with many such incidences. Terrorists blowing up buses, army conveys in Iraq, suicide bombings wherever they take place, how to make bombs, hate speeches, propaganda, or whatever. Everything is available on the net.
The catch-22 situation now for the media is that they have to show (moral standings notwithstanding) because in any case they would be available to whosoever seeks the info/videos.
If an Ayman al-Zawahiri or an Osama bin-Laden or any other wants to bring out a tape, they wouldn’t depend upon the mainstream media to let their voices out. They already have the tool - Internet.
So, as I said, it’s a wee-bit late now to pin it on media (read mainstream media). The thing has gone out of every authority’s hands.
Whatever they say should be heard by all. Firstly it will expose them to the public as to what they are. An informed citizen will be of immense help to the law enforcement agencies.
Secondly the notion of curbing the media from reporting whatever Laden or al Zawahiri says smacks of paternalism. ”The public is not clever enough and might be swayed by those madcaps.” This attitude is a sure-fire recipe to the rise of totalitarianism, which will only help the likes of the Fanatic fom Saudi Arabia.
Information is wealth!
Thanks and Regards,
Ramya Tadikonda.
what am i tryin to say is that the media’s job to report on all aspects of the story is important but the more important part what i see as missing these days from the main stream media is responsibility. We have to responsibly see who he was rather than knowing that he had a profile on Orkut or Facebook for that matter. this is so irrelevant to the incident and a serious mishandling of the coverage that we unfortunately see too often these days. That’s an obligation of ours.
One can already hear the roar coming out of the mouths of many who have not been thinking of this in a critical way, particularly those well-paid mouthpieces on TV and radio masquerading themselves REPORTERS
The George Orwell told us in his essay how the words, especially the adjectives, are exploited for the purpose of propaganda.
Saying that media has a duty to present the facts is right, but don’t it also has responsibility to hide many facts? Many times some facts are there only to be misused. When the name of terrorists are given in media the Muslims terrorists are more spotlighted creating the wrong notion that all terrorists are Muslims, which is factually wrong, making an atmosphere where every Musilm with a beard is seen with a suspicious eye.
Media has very important function in any state that is to ask the right questions. But that is a far more difficult thing than it sounds, and erring in it without realising is very easy. So it is requested that freedom of speech which is a basic right of every human on the face of earth be exercised judiciously as its repercussions are really grave for everyone.
It’s media’s job to report on all aspects of the news that include the background of killers without eulogizing. And if the things are brought on fore, doesn’t matter how bad they are, why to blame it on media?
Many people think media as a source of conflicts and gossips and they have a wrong impression that they only sensationalize stories. If you think media are violating any law, go to the courts and file a case so that they will be punished for what they are doing.
In cases of extremism, it is better to be more aware of the situation of possible terror attacks than to treat this as a normal thing.
Since media are able to communicate to these fanatics only tells us that authorities are lax in capturing the terrorists. In cases like this, the issue of extremism seems to be game without full force of the police to hunt terrorists.
Instead of just pointing fingers to media as ”exaggerated” storytellers, take your part in extinguishing extremism and suggest ways to the government to solve the issue of extremism.
Maynard Delfin
Manila, Philippines
However, today it has gone beyond traditional media’s hands either to play down or over play a terror incident. The terrorists have taken matters into their own hands. They have become internet savvy. Now, every beheading is being broadcasted thru their own websites, community video sharing sites like YouTube etc. It is now not dependent upon traditional media to spread whatever they are doing.
When the Wall Street journal Daniel Pearl was murdered, not even a single TV news channel showed what it was like. But the video nonetheless, was ’leaked’ and is freely available all over the net. Same goes with many such incidences. Terrorists blowing up buses, army conveys in Iraq, suicide bombings wherever they take place, how to make bombs, hate speeches, propaganda, or whatever. Everything is available on the net.
The catch-22 situation now for the media is that they have to show (moral standings notwithstanding) because in any case they would be available to whosoever seeks the info/videos.
If an Ayman al-Zawahiri or an Osama bin-Laden or any other wants to bring out a tape, they wouldn’t depend upon the mainstream media to let their voices out. They already have the tool - Internet.
So, as I said, it’s a wee-bit late now to pin it on media (read mainstream media). The thing has gone out of every authority’s hands.
Whatever they say should be heard by all. Firstly it will expose them to the public as to what they are. An informed citizen will be of immense help to the law enforcement agencies.
Secondly the notion of curbing the media from reporting whatever Laden or al Zawahiri says smacks of paternalism. ”The public is not clever enough and might be swayed by those madcaps.” This attitude is a sure-fire recipe to the rise of totalitarianism, which will only help the likes of the Fanatic fom Saudi Arabia.
Information is wealth!
Thanks and Regards,
Ramya Tadikonda.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 




















what am i tryin to say is that the media’s job to report on all aspects of the story is important but the more important part what i see as missing these days from the main stream media is responsibility. We have to responsibly see who he was rather than knowing that he had a profile on Orkut or Facebook for that matter. this is so irrelevant to the incident and a serious mishandling of the coverage that we unfortunately see too often these days. That’s an obligation of ours.
One can already hear the roar coming out of the mouths of many who have not been thinking of this in a critical way, particularly those well-paid mouthpieces on TV and radio masquerading themselves REPORTERS