Can local communities alone rout Taliban in Afghanistan?
Pankaj , Shimla:
Mar 26 2008
Made Popular Mar 26 2008
# An influential Afghan minister has called on the West to allow local communities in Afghanistan to take over the fight against the Taliban to what he calls the ‘Afghanisation’ of security.
# The model of “Afghanisation” of security has worked successfully in provinces like Khost and Paktia in the south-east, where the Taliban are active.
# While Nato leaders have been calling for member countries to commit more troops to Afghanistan, ‘Afghanisation’ is a popular concept at the moment within Nato.
# This model of security promises to defeat the Taliban in five years, and at the same time money being spent on foreign troops could be better spent in training and providing resources to local communities.
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry, no media found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Agree
Parul G
Mar 26 2008
Delhi,
India
America and its allies have been struggling to control Taliban for almost six year. In this scenario it will not be a bad idea to allow locals to nab the culprit of Taliban. After it were locals who forced mighty Russians forces to retreat in late 1980s.
Comment Link
(Global Perspectives)
0 Stars
Agree
Hi
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
1 Stars
Disagree
NATO’s Afghanistan strategy being in doldrums has sent a clear message to the natives that foreign troops can achieve very little out here. At this point of time, Mohammad Hanif Atmar’s claim that the local communities can defeat the Taliban in five years, whereas NATO forces will take 15, seems feasible. However, it can’t be possible if Afghanistan forces will try to tackle the menace single handedly. They need expertise and both financial and troop support of other forces too.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
1 Stars
Agree
Ofcourse the locals can, after all, the Taliban are their very own countrymen and if someone can really counter them, they are the Afghani’s themselves.
3 Stars
Disagree
Local tribes do have an important role to play in the fight against the Taliban. Without their active support the war against terrorism in Afghanistan is all but a lost cause. But to think that the local tribes are capable enough to rout Taliban on their own would be a folly. Without the expertise and firepower of the foreign troops on their side, tribes would be fighting a very difficult battle. It is quite clear that both the forces need to work in unison to lay Taliban to rest once and for all.
1 Stars
Agree
Well, if one tries to search a logical answer to this question, he has no choice but to say ’No’, but.. the same logic poses two more questions –
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
1 Stars
Disagree
For the meantime that ”Afghanisation security” is in the process of forming a stronger force, foreign aid should be employed. The Afghan government should lay down the cards of its plan in battling the Taliban and seek resources to prepare the Afghan troops against the enemies.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
1 Stars
Agree
Well, yeah,i mean the local communities should certainly be provided a chance so that they could do what NATO couldn’t do. The foreign troops and NATO in Afghanistan are just bullshitting their time and efforts over there with no positive result. so, Localites deserve a chance to prove their worth.
1 Stars
Disagree
i don think if this kinda model will work to defeat/rout Taliban...if locals are given the authority i am sure they will come to ass kicking of the current Karzai Govt. There are possibilities that similar days of Taliban with Islamic laws will once again prevail in the ruins of Afghanistan.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
1 Stars
Disagree
In my view local participation is critical in rooting out the kind of radical ideology from the community that feeds the Taliban. The Taliban could come to power because it brought in a new ideology and was welcomed with open arms by a majority of the Afghans initially.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
1 Stars
Agree
Just like any terrorist spawning from any community, Taliban terrorists spawn from communities too. The local communities can go a long distance in trying to encourage moderation in religious practices and also check who within the society is getting mislead.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
1 Stars
Disagree
To defeat the Taliban one must defeat the Taliban ideology. The more bombs you drop killing civilians in your fight against terrorism will ironically result in more people willing to blow themselves up.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
1 Stars
Disagree
The Afghanistisation of Afghan security will backfire unless and untill the NATO stops killing civilians. Else this will mean that the Afghans siding with the Western forces are collaborators hence, traitors.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
1 Stars
Agree
it is difficult to say... the taliban will not hesitate killing its own relatives because of the radical belief they have of the concept of jehad. but the afghan security forces who will fight the taliban will have some degree of conscience and attachment towards life and love...
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
Local Opinions (0)
Global Opinions (14)
1 Stars
Agree
America and its allies have been struggling to control Taliban for almost six year. In this scenario it will not be a bad idea to allow locals to nab the culprit of Taliban. After it were locals who forced mighty Russians forces to retreat in late 1980s.
0 Stars
Agree
Hi
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
1 Stars
Disagree
NATO’s Afghanistan strategy being in doldrums has sent a clear message to the natives that foreign troops can achieve very little out here. At this point of time, Mohammad Hanif Atmar’s claim that the local communities can defeat the Taliban in five years, whereas NATO forces will take 15, seems feasible. However, it can’t be possible if Afghanistan forces will try to tackle the menace single handedly. They need expertise and both financial and troop support of other forces too.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
1 Stars
Agree
Ofcourse the locals can, after all, the Taliban are their very own countrymen and if someone can really counter them, they are the Afghani’s themselves.
3 Stars
Disagree
Local tribes do have an important role to play in the fight against the Taliban. Without their active support the war against terrorism in Afghanistan is all but a lost cause. But to think that the local tribes are capable enough to rout Taliban on their own would be a folly. Without the expertise and firepower of the foreign troops on their side, tribes would be fighting a very difficult battle. It is quite clear that both the forces need to work in unison to lay Taliban to rest once and for all.
1 Stars
Agree
Well, if one tries to search a logical answer to this question, he has no choice but to say ’No’, but.. the same logic poses two more questions –
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
1 Stars
Disagree
For the meantime that ”Afghanisation security” is in the process of forming a stronger force, foreign aid should be employed. The Afghan government should lay down the cards of its plan in battling the Taliban and seek resources to prepare the Afghan troops against the enemies.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
1 Stars
Agree
Well, yeah,i mean the local communities should certainly be provided a chance so that they could do what NATO couldn’t do. The foreign troops and NATO in Afghanistan are just bullshitting their time and efforts over there with no positive result. so, Localites deserve a chance to prove their worth.
1 Stars
Disagree
i don think if this kinda model will work to defeat/rout Taliban...if locals are given the authority i am sure they will come to ass kicking of the current Karzai Govt. There are possibilities that similar days of Taliban with Islamic laws will once again prevail in the ruins of Afghanistan.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
1 Stars
Disagree
In my view local participation is critical in rooting out the kind of radical ideology from the community that feeds the Taliban. The Taliban could come to power because it brought in a new ideology and was welcomed with open arms by a majority of the Afghans initially.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
1 Stars
Agree
Just like any terrorist spawning from any community, Taliban terrorists spawn from communities too. The local communities can go a long distance in trying to encourage moderation in religious practices and also check who within the society is getting mislead.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
1 Stars
Disagree
To defeat the Taliban one must defeat the Taliban ideology. The more bombs you drop killing civilians in your fight against terrorism will ironically result in more people willing to blow themselves up.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
1 Stars
Disagree
The Afghanistisation of Afghan security will backfire unless and untill the NATO stops killing civilians. Else this will mean that the Afghans siding with the Western forces are collaborators hence, traitors.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
1 Stars
Agree
it is difficult to say... the taliban will not hesitate killing its own relatives because of the radical belief they have of the concept of jehad. but the afghan security forces who will fight the taliban will have some degree of conscience and attachment towards life and love...
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
Agree (7)
1 Stars
America and its allies have been struggling to control Taliban for almost six year. In this scenario it will not be a bad idea to allow locals to nab the culprit of Taliban. After it were locals who forced mighty Russians forces to retreat in late 1980s.
(Global Perspectives)
0 Stars
Hi
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
Very rightly said. The money spent on foreign troops could be spent for training local groups. Atleast, it wil help boost economic conditions of Afghan people, even if in a minor way. Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, presence of American troops does not help much. And the local troops and if training be given to them, wil go a long way in helping the country ravaged by wars
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Ofcourse the locals can, after all, the Taliban are their very own countrymen and if someone can really counter them, they are the Afghani’s themselves.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Well, if one tries to search a logical answer to this question, he has no choice but to say ’No’, but.. the same logic poses two more questions –
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
1) Are foreign troops really successful in their battle against Taliban?
2) Has Afghanistan gained any edge over the Taliban owing to the presence of foreign troops?
Unfortunately for Afghanistan, the answer to both of these questions is a ’NO’.
Hence, there is no harm in trying the Beta version of Afghanisation because...
Its a trial n error situation for Afghanistan. If the local tribes fail to nail Taliban (much like the foreign troops), Afghanistan will not lose much as this will translate to status quo for Afghanistan, but.. if God wills and they succeed, then Afghanistan has too much to gain.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Well, yeah,i mean the local communities should certainly be provided a chance so that they could do what NATO couldn’t do. The foreign troops and NATO in Afghanistan are just bullshitting their time and efforts over there with no positive result. so, Localites deserve a chance to prove their worth.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Just like any terrorist spawning from any community, Taliban terrorists spawn from communities too. The local communities can go a long distance in trying to encourage moderation in religious practices and also check who within the society is getting mislead.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
They can de-glamorize the concept of fighting the West by bringing healthy discussions how and why the West is so important for the prosperity of the Afghan nation.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
it is difficult to say... the taliban will not hesitate killing its own relatives because of the radical belief they have of the concept of jehad. but the afghan security forces who will fight the taliban will have some degree of conscience and attachment towards life and love...
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
years of fighting has actually made the whole population to accept loss of near and dear ones as normal esp in the regions where conflicts never cease to end...
i hope it works but looks very difficult.
(Global Perspectives)
Disagree (7)
1 Stars
NATO’s Afghanistan strategy being in doldrums has sent a clear message to the natives that foreign troops can achieve very little out here. At this point of time, Mohammad Hanif Atmar’s claim that the local communities can defeat the Taliban in five years, whereas NATO forces will take 15, seems feasible. However, it can’t be possible if Afghanistan forces will try to tackle the menace single handedly. They need expertise and both financial and troop support of other forces too.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
Both working together can only dream of defeating the Taliban or it’s not possible, especially when the Taliban have extended their control in southern regions. And what local community and forces is the government talking about? The local villagers are already won over by the Taliban. They strongly support the Taliban way of life and justice – with their own courts and more than 2,000 active fighters in Wardak alone.
The battle this time is much harder.
And let’s not talk about peace and defeat here. There are other problems to tackle first. And what about the support they’re getting from Pakistan (but, here too, the things seems a bit more murky and not at all in the favor of Afghanistan’s overall peace process, if it exists).
It’s time for the Afghan government to talk sensibly.
(Global Perspectives)
3 Stars
Local tribes do have an important role to play in the fight against the Taliban. Without their active support the war against terrorism in Afghanistan is all but a lost cause. But to think that the local tribes are capable enough to rout Taliban on their own would be a folly. Without the expertise and firepower of the foreign troops on their side, tribes would be fighting a very difficult battle. It is quite clear that both the forces need to work in unison to lay Taliban to rest once and for all.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
For the meantime that ”Afghanisation security” is in the process of forming a stronger force, foreign aid should be employed. The Afghan government should lay down the cards of its plan in battling the Taliban and seek resources to prepare the Afghan troops against the enemies.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
The NATO forces are simply there since there is no other solution that they see viable to track down the Taliban. They feel their presence in the region is productive and weakens the angering Taliban groups.
But still local Afghan communities have the major responsibility of protecting their lands against cruelty and abuse.
As of know, Afghanistan seems to be powerless or perhaps lacks the resources to fight back the Taliban so the NATO forces need to be in the region for protection and support.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
i don think if this kinda model will work to defeat/rout Taliban...if locals are given the authority i am sure they will come to ass kicking of the current Karzai Govt. There are possibilities that similar days of Taliban with Islamic laws will once again prevail in the ruins of Afghanistan.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
Taliban might be defeated but it will be replaced with Afghanisation and i fear it will be any better than the current enemy.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
In my view local participation is critical in rooting out the kind of radical ideology from the community that feeds the Taliban. The Taliban could come to power because it brought in a new ideology and was welcomed with open arms by a majority of the Afghans initially.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
They thought that it would be the single uniting force with a common ideological factor that would bind the fragmented country and weed out the corrupt warlords whose fiefdoms pockmarked the Afghan landscape prior to Taliban rule after the fall of Najibullah's Soviet-backed government.
This ideology turned out to be highly venomous for the Afghan people who were suffocated no end by the radical Islamic rule changing their traditional way of life. Not only this, it also spread hatred across the world and exported terrorism worldwide.
Now Taliban is no longer an ideological movement. It is purely a terror movement now. Local communities can help reducing the spread of hate ideology, but only so much. They cannot 'unbrainwash' recruits who have turned into zombies controlled by their ideological masters to blow themselves up or fight against peace.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
To defeat the Taliban one must defeat the Taliban ideology. The more bombs you drop killing civilians in your fight against terrorism will ironically result in more people willing to blow themselves up.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
First the bombs must stop and then the local communities can take over. Look what is happening in Kashmir. The Indian government is not dropping bombs on civilian populations to kill terrorists. The security forces use extreme caution in engaging terrorists. Then they are doing all to win the hearts and minds of the people. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in how Kashmiris think of India today.
The result is all for us to see. Kashmiris do not talk about freedom from India as the way they used to before. The common voices have almost died down. The militants are finding it increasingly difficult to sustain themselves. Therefore we see them taking desparate measures like suicidal attacks. This is in sharp contrast to what Israel is doing in Palestine and Western forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan forces in the NWFP region.
Local communities can help but only if the bombs stop first.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
The Afghanistisation of Afghan security will backfire unless and untill the NATO stops killing civilians. Else this will mean that the Afghans siding with the Western forces are collaborators hence, traitors.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
It is not as simple as that. There has to be a multi-pronged strategy to bring peace to Afghanistan.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment
Home


RSS 














